Core sepsis-related competencies for medical students: an international consensus by Delphi technique.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gomersall Elanor Lian Mary, Ling Lowell, Reinhart Konrad, Bion Victoria, Ekesh Abeselom, Adu-Takyi Christiana, Azevedo Luciano Cesar Pontes, Banguti Paulin Ruhato, Cohen Jonathan, Diaz Janet Victoria, Du Bin, Goldfarb David M, Gorordo-Delsol Luis Antonio, Graham Colin Alexander, Iramain Ricardo, Jacob Shevin T, Kecskes Zsuzsoka, Kissoon Niranjan, Lipman Jeffrey, Lundeg Ganbold, Maitland Kathryn, Mergani Kamal Osman, Moschides Christopher, Nakalembe Miriam, Ndu Ikenna Kingsley, Oon Jolene, Sale Trina, Shresthra Ashis, Stockley Simon, Talmor Daniel, Tse Audrey Bree, Zachariah Anand, Joynt Gavin Matthew
Аннотация
METHODS: Two separate panels from high or upper-middle income and low or lower-middle income countries/regions participated in a Delphi method to suggest and rank sepsis competencies for medical students. Each panel consisted of 13-18 key stakeholders of medical education and doctors in specialties where sepsis is a common problem (both specialists and trainees). Panelists came from all continents, except Antarctica.
RESULTS: The panels reached consensus on 38 essential sepsis competencies in low or lower-middle income countries/regions and 33 in high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions. These include competencies such as definition of sepsis and septic shock and urgency of antibiotic treatment. In the low or lower-middle income countries/regions group, consensus was also achieved for competencies ranked as very important, and was achieved in 4/5 competencies rated as moderately important. In the high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions group, consensus was achieved in 41/57 competencies rated as very important but only 6/11 competencies rated as moderately important.
CONCLUSION: Medical schools should consider developing curricula to address essential competencies, as a minimum, but also consider addressing competencies rated as very or moderately important.