MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/cancers17020205

Медицинская библиотека · Cancers · 2025

An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of First-Line Triplet vs. Doublet Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Matsukawa Akihiro, Litterio Giulio, Cormio Angelo, Miszczyk Marcin, Kardoust Parizi Mehdi, Fazekas Tamás, Tsuboi Ichiro, Mancon Stefano, Schulz Robert J, Laukhtina Ekaterina, Rajwa Paweł, Mori Keiichiro, Chlosta Piotr, Marchioni Michele, Schips Luigi, Miki Jun, Kimura Takahiro, Shariat Shahrokh F, Yanagisawa Takafumi

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Purpose: The addition of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), with or without docetaxel (Doc), is currently recommended for metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Recently, the ARANOTE trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of Darolutamide + ADT in this setting. We aimed to update a network meta-analysis (NMA) of these combination therapies.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search for RCTs on systemic therapies for mHSPC using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection in September 2024. An NMA utilizing random-effects models was performed to compare progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse event (AE) incidence (PROSPERO: CRD42024591458).

Results

A total of 12 RCTs (n = 11,954) were included in our NMAs. Triplet therapies were associated with significant improvements in PFS compared to ARPI-based doublet therapies (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.93; p = 0.01), but the difference did not reach the conventional levels of statistical significance for OS (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67-1.01; p = 0.059). In a subset analysis, compared to ARPI-based doublet therapies, triplet therapies showed a significant improvement in PFS in patients with high-volume disease (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47-0.88; p < 0.01), whereas no significant improvement was observed in those with low-volume disease (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.45-1.67; p = 0.7). No significant difference in grade ≥ 3 AEs was observed between triplet therapies and ARPI-based doublet therapies. The main limitations include patient heterogeneity and limited follow-up in some studies.

Conclusions

Triplet therapies can improve the oncologic outcomes of patients with mHSPC compared to ARPI-based doublet therapies, without significantly increasing severe AEs. These findings warrant further confirmation in a head-to-head trial powered for overall survival.

Для цитирования: Matsukawa Akihiro, Litterio Giulio, Cormio Angelo, Miszczyk Marcin, Kardoust Parizi Mehdi, Fazekas Tamás, Tsuboi Ichiro, Mancon Stefano, Schulz Robert J, Laukhtina Ekaterina, Rajwa Paweł, Mori Keiichiro, Chlosta Piotr, Marchioni Michele, Schips Luigi, Miki Jun, Kimura Takahiro, Shariat Shahrokh F, Yanagisawa Takafumi. An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of First-Line Triplet vs. Doublet Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.. Cancers. 2025. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020205.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.