MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00405-024-08868-7

Медицинская библиотека · European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024

Investigating the role of artificial intelligence in predicting perceived dysphonia level.

Saeedi Saeed, Aghajanzadeh Mahshid

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the role of one of these models in the field of voice pathology and compare its performance in distinguishing the perceived dysphonia level.

METHODS

Demographic information, voice self-assessments, and acoustic measurements related to a sample of 50 adult dysphonic outpatients were presented to ChatGPT and Perplexity AI chatbots, which were interrogated for the perceived dysphonia level.

RESULTS

The agreement between the auditory-perceptual assessment by experts and ChatGPT and Perplexity AI chatbots, as determined by Cohen's Kappa, was not statistically significant (p = 0.429). There was also a low positive correlation (rs = 0.30, p = 0.03) between the diagnosis made by ChatGPT and Perplexity AI chatbots (rs = 0.30, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

It seems that AI could not play a vital role in helping the voice care teams determine the perceptual level of dysphonia.

Для цитирования: Saeedi Saeed, Aghajanzadeh Mahshid. Investigating the role of artificial intelligence in predicting perceived dysphonia level.. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08868-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.