MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.rmcr.2021.101561

Медицинская библиотека · Respiratory medicine case reports · 2021

Case series of endoscopic treatment of post-intubation tracheal stenosis.

Salloum Salim, Tawk Michel, Nehme Ralph, Siblani Dima, Haddad Youssef

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Benign tracheal stenosis is a common problem encountered after tracheal intubation or tracheostomy. It can be managed by surgical or nonsurgical techniques. This case series describes the outcome of 11 cases of endobronchial treatment for complex tracheal stenoses.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out in two hospitals in Lebanon. Patients were contacted on a regular basis for 6 months and asked about the presence of dyspnea and its characteristics.

RESULTS

The most common presenting symptom was inspiratory stridor. Five patients (45.45%) were not satisfied after the bronchoscopic intervention. Six patients (54.55%) were satisfied with the outcome. All were initially treated with argon plasma coagulation and dilation. If any persistent symptoms were present, stenting was done. Three patients had a stent placement. Failure of stenting occurred with two patients. None of the satisfied patients had any early symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Bronchoscopic interventions yielded acceptable results when treating complex stenoses. More data is still needed to guide physicians for better approaches. When confronting complex tracheal stenosis, a multidisciplinary approach between surgical and nonsurgical doctors is preferred to choose the best medical care.

Для цитирования: Salloum Salim, Tawk Michel, Nehme Ralph, Siblani Dima, Haddad Youssef. Case series of endoscopic treatment of post-intubation tracheal stenosis.. Respiratory medicine case reports. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2021.101561.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.