MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1021/acsomega.6c03518

Медицинская библиотека · ACS omega · 2026

Recognition Analysis of Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma and Confused Varieties according to Chemometrics and Machine Learning.

Cao Tingting, Zhao Jiyu, Ji Xuweisheng, Liang Hao, Zhou Ning, Kang Lin, Guo Feng, Li Siyang

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Ginseng radix et rhizoma (GRER) is widely used in China and around the world. Due to the shortages, high prices, and profitability, the market is also full of its confused varieties. Notoginseng radix et rhizoma, panacis quinquefolii radix, ginseng folium, and ginseng radix et rhizoma rubra are GRER's common confused varieties, which affected the market order and drug safety in the case of incorrect use. Therefore, it is very important to realize the recognition analysis of GRER and its confused varieties.

METHODS

GRER and its confused varieties were studied using ultraperformance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry to convert the data matrix. Then, the data matrix was used to conduct principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). At the same time, the data matrix was also used to construct data identification models based on machine learning, and the best model was screened for external appraisal and verification analysis. Moreover, the differential chemical components were analyzed on the basis of feature screening.

RESULTS

the data matrices contained 1971 chemical components and PCA and PLS-DA results showed that GRER cannot be clearly distinguished from confused varieties. However, all the identification models based on K-nearest neighbor, artificial neural network, support vector machine, naive bayes, and random forest (RF) had an excellent identification effect with area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.980, accuracy ≥0.800, and precision ≥0.870 in which the RF model showed the best recognition effect with AUC = 1.000, accuracy = 1.000, and precision = 1.000. Twenty batches of test samples were accurately identified by external verification, and the correct rate was 100%. Pseudoginsenoside F11, ginsenoside Rb2, ginsenoside Ro, and so on were the important distinguishing chemical markers.

CONCLUSION

compared with chemometrics, machine learning presented better identification results. Moreover, the RF model has the best recognition effect, which helps to identify the GRER and its confused varieties. In addition, the characteristic components based on feature screening also contributed to the discrimination of the GRER and its confused varieties.

Для цитирования: Cao Tingting, Zhao Jiyu, Ji Xuweisheng, Liang Hao, Zhou Ning, Kang Lin, Guo Feng, Li Siyang. Recognition Analysis of Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma and Confused Varieties according to Chemometrics and Machine Learning.. ACS omega. 2026. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.6c03518.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.