MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0003134820940629

Медицинская библиотека · The American surgeon · 2020

Radiographic Determination of Skeletal Maturity Guides Optimal Timing of Bar Removal After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum.

Bond Logan M, Bond Sheldon J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A small number of patients treated with minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum recur after bar removal. This risk appears to be greater in younger children who continue to grow following bar removal.

METHODS

We propose the use of wrist films to determine skeletal maturity and delay bar removal until it is completed. This is not possible in very young patients (less than 14 years of age) or necessary in patients older than 19.

RESULTS

In the 14-year to 18-year age group, we have used wrist films to determine skeletal maturity in 25 patients. Ten patients (age 14-18) demonstrated full maturation, and their bars were removed at 2 years. Five patients had films that demonstrated nearly closed growth plates, and those bars were removed 6 months later (2.5 years post-insertion). Ten patients had 2 sets of films taken, initially at 2 years post-operation demonstrating open growth plates. Films 12 months later showed skeletal maturation. Their bars were removed at 3 years post-operation. There were no recurrences with an average follow-up of 3 years.

DISCUSSION: Radiographic determination of skeletal maturity may be used as a guide to the timing of bar removal following the correction of pectus excavatum.

Для цитирования: Bond Logan M, Bond Sheldon J. Radiographic Determination of Skeletal Maturity Guides Optimal Timing of Bar Removal After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum.. The American surgeon. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0003134820940629.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.