Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 1998
The influence of an instruction on the stimulus effects of drugs in humans.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Johanson C E, Preston K
Аннотация
Participants discriminated between tripelennamine and placebo in experiments differing in instructional set. In 1 experiment (SED), participants were told that 1 of the 2 drugs was more sedative-like, and during the other (STIM), 1 was more stimulant-like. During generalization tests, participants received diazepam or d-amphetamine. Percent correct was the same in both experiments. Tripelennamine increased sedative and decreased stimulant effects. Amphetamine and diazepam produced typical subjective effects. Some subjective effects differed across experiments with more sedative and less stimulant effects during SED than STIM. In SED and STIM, capsules were labeled 80% of the time as a sedative and stimulant, respectively. Thus, instructions designed to give expectations had no effect on discrimination and only a few changes in subjective effects. When asked to name the drug that they believed they received, labels reflected instructional set.