Advances in respiratory medicine · 2018
Is bronchoscopy always justified in diagnosis of haemoptysis?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Torbiarczyk Justyna Maria, Sobczak Patryk Aleksander, Torbiarczyk Katarzyna Krystyna, Miłkowska-Dymanowska Joanna, Antczak Adam, Górski Paweł, Białas Adam J, Piotrowski Wojciech J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Fiber-optic bronchoscopy (FOB) is commonly performed in the first line in diagnostic process of haemoptysis. However, lots of evidences suggest that in haemoptysis FOB do not always provide additional, useful information to radiological diagnostics. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the validity of performing FOB as a method of choice in first line diagnostics of haemoptysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data comprised consecutively collected results from patients referred for FOB assessment for clinical purposes were retrospectively analysed. We included all examinations, which were performed due to haemoptysis as the only indication, excluding any other lung-related conditions.
RESULTS: 114 patients were finally included to the study. The median age was 59 (IQR: 46-64.75). Active bleeding was visualized during examination of 13 (11.4%) patients. Patients with active bleeding did not differ significantly according to age: 59 (54-69) vs 59 (45-64) years; W = 532.5, p-value = 0.27, and gender: c2 = 1.68, p-value = 0.2. On the other hand, in 29 (25.44%) patients, FOB revealed no visible abnormalities. This subgroup of patients was significantly younger - 46 (34-62) years vs 60 (53-67) years; W = 782, p-value = 0.003.
CONCLUSION: Low number of visualized active bleeding sites suggest overuse of bronchoscopy in diagnosis of haemoptysis. Indications for this examination should be reconsidered especially in young patients with non-massive haemoptysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data comprised consecutively collected results from patients referred for FOB assessment for clinical purposes were retrospectively analysed. We included all examinations, which were performed due to haemoptysis as the only indication, excluding any other lung-related conditions.
RESULTS: 114 patients were finally included to the study. The median age was 59 (IQR: 46-64.75). Active bleeding was visualized during examination of 13 (11.4%) patients. Patients with active bleeding did not differ significantly according to age: 59 (54-69) vs 59 (45-64) years; W = 532.5, p-value = 0.27, and gender: c2 = 1.68, p-value = 0.2. On the other hand, in 29 (25.44%) patients, FOB revealed no visible abnormalities. This subgroup of patients was significantly younger - 46 (34-62) years vs 60 (53-67) years; W = 782, p-value = 0.003.
CONCLUSION: Low number of visualized active bleeding sites suggest overuse of bronchoscopy in diagnosis of haemoptysis. Indications for this examination should be reconsidered especially in young patients with non-massive haemoptysis.