MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1245/s10434-026-20201-6

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of surgical oncology · 2026

A Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of the da Vinci SP® Surgical System versus Open Surgery in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) Procedures for Patients with Breast Cancer.

Kopkash Katherine, Piltin Mara, Jakub James, Javid Sara, Flanagan Meghan R, Aft Rebecca, Chiba Akiko, Lal Alysandra, Brooks Ari D, Amersi Farin, Dekhne Nayana, Tseng Jennifer, Farley Clara, Kadison Alan, Johnson Jeffrey, Hwang Rosa F

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This prospective randomized trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (rNSM) using the da Vinci Single Port (SP)® compared with open NSM in women with early stage breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

This Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational device exemption (IDE)-approved, two-arm, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomized eligible women (clinical Tis-T2, N0) 1:1 to rNSM or open NSM with immediate implant-based reconstruction. Operations were performed at 14 US sites by 23 surgeons. Primary endpoints included conversion to open surgery, adverse events at 42 days, and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates. Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and skin flap viability, final pathology, and patient-reported outcomes (BREAST-Q).

RESULTS

Overall, 74 patients completed surgery, totaling 65 rNSM (38 therapeutic, 27 prophylactic) and 66 open NSM (38 therapeutic, 28 prophylactic). Operative time was longer for rNSM (141.6 versus 83.9 min) with no conversions to open surgery. Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in three rNSM and eight open NSM patients, with no device-related SAEs reported. NAC preservation at 42 days was 100% for rNSM and 98.5% for open NSM. PSM rates were identical (six patients each). Higher BREAST-Q scores favored rNSM in multiple domains.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that da Vinci SP® rNSM is feasible and has a safety profile comparable to open NSM for early stage breast cancer, with similar margin status and postoperative complications. Although SAEs and patient-reported outcomes were more favorable with rNSM, these differences were not statistically significant. rNSM was associated with longer operative times, which may in part reflect early experience with the technique.

Для цитирования: Kopkash Katherine, Piltin Mara, Jakub James, Javid Sara, Flanagan Meghan R, Aft Rebecca, Chiba Akiko, Lal Alysandra, Brooks Ari D, Amersi Farin, Dekhne Nayana, Tseng Jennifer, Farley Clara, Kadison Alan, Johnson Jeffrey, Hwang Rosa F. A Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of the da Vinci SP® Surgical System versus Open Surgery in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) Procedures for Patients with Breast Cancer.. Annals of surgical oncology. 2026. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-026-20201-6.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.