MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1515/jpm-2014-0109

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of perinatal medicine · 2015

Controversial clinical practices for patients with preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome: a survey.

Basaran Ahmet, Basaran Mustafa, Basaran Betul, Sen Cihat, Martin James N

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Considerable controversy continues to surround the management of severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Experts, researchers, and those published in the field were surveyed about their specific practices.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

An extensive literature search was undertaken to identify the cohort of authors with recent publications on the subjects of preeclampsia (2009-2012) and HELLP syndrome (2005-2012). Online surveys were sent to all authors using the email addresses found in their publications.

RESULTS

Surveys were delivered by email to 363 authors of preeclampsia publications and 91 authors of HELLP syndrome publications. Completed surveys were received from 61 (13.4%) of the group. Except for consensus about the indication of corticosteroids for the enhancement of fetal lung maturation, there was considerable variation in corticosteroid practice and anesthesia techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

A marked diversity in practice characterized the clinical care rendered by experts in the field of preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Thus, there is an urgent need for well-designed and executed prospective clinical trials to improve the evidence for best consensus practice in this area of obstetrical medicine.

Для цитирования: Basaran Ahmet, Basaran Mustafa, Basaran Betul, Sen Cihat, Martin James N. Controversial clinical practices for patients with preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome: a survey.. Journal of perinatal medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0109.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.