MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1197/j.jht.2006.04.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists · 2006

The impact of wrist extension provocation on current perception thresholds in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a pilot study.

Aird Jeff, Cady Ryan, Nagi Haseeb, Kullar Shaveen, MacDermid Joy C

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine whether current perception threshold (CPT) varied between subjects with and without carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and whether positioning in wrist extension (reversed Phalen's test) was provocative.

METHOD: Subjects (n=30) were tested using the Neurometer (Neutron, Inc., Baltimore, MD) at 5, 250, and 2,000 Hz in a rest and reverse Phalen's position. Group and positional differences were analyzed using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Higher CPT occurred at 2,000 Hz in both rest (p=0.02) and reverse Phalen's position (p=0.01) in CTS subjects. There was also a significant change in CPT in the CTS group following wrist extension, particularly at 2,000 Hz (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

A positional effect on sensibility was noted at 2,000 Hz in subjects with CTS. Further evaluation is required to determine the role and optimal test protocols for provocative-sensory testing in diagnosis and outcome assessment of CTS. For CPT these should focus on using the 2,000 Hz frequency.

Для цитирования: Aird Jeff, Cady Ryan, Nagi Haseeb, Kullar Shaveen, MacDermid Joy C. The impact of wrist extension provocation on current perception thresholds in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a pilot study.. Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists. 2006. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.04.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.