MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.09.014

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cardiology · 2018

Comparative analysis of balloon- versus mechanically-expandable transcatheter heart valves considering landing zone calcification.

Schofer Niklas, Deuschl Florian, Schön Gerhard, Seiffert Moritz, Linder Matthias, Schaefer Andreas, Schirmer Johannes, Lubos Edith, Reichenspurner Hermann, Blankenberg Stefan, Conradi Lenard, Schäfer Ulrich

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The balloon-expandable Sapien 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) and the mechanically-expandable Lotus valve (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) are established devices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. We sought to compare both transcatheter heart valves (THV) under consideration of the extent of THV landing zone calcification.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis includes consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with Sapien 3 (S3; n=212) or Lotus (n=61) THV via transfemoral access. Outcome was assessed according to VARC II definitions. Rate of paravalvular leakage (PVL), periprocedural stroke, and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) was adjusted for THV landing zone calcification as calculated by multi-slice computed tomography.

RESULTS

There was no difference in preoperative risk (all results as follows S3 vs. Lotus: STS-PROM 5.9±5.6% vs. 4.8±2.6%, p=0.14), rate of device success (95.3% vs. 95.1%, p=0.67), 30-day mortality (1.9% vs. 4.9%, p=0.16), periprocedural stroke (1.4% vs. 4.9%, p=0.27), and major access site complications (9.4% vs. 9.8%, p=0.93). PPI was more frequent (19.4% vs. 34.4%, p=0.01) and significant PVL was less frequent (≥mild PVL: 17.6% vs. 3.7%, p=0.04) after Lotus implantation. No association was found between landing zone calcification and periprocedural stroke rate (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.92-1.54, p=0.17) or need for PPI (OR 1.04, 95%CI 0.91-1.18, p=0.57). The extent of landing zone calcification was associated with risk for PVL ≥mild (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.03-1.42, p=0.02). After adjusting for landing zone calcification risk for PVL ≥mild was lower with the Lotus valve (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.02-0.54, p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Both THVs yield comparable procedural and clinical outcomes except for a higher PPI rate with the Lotus valve, which is independent from the extent of landing zone calcification. The extent of landing zone calcification is associated with an increased risk for PVL for both THV, but is significantly reduced with the Lotus valve.

Для цитирования: Schofer Niklas, Deuschl Florian, Schön Gerhard, Seiffert Moritz, Linder Matthias, Schaefer Andreas, Schirmer Johannes, Lubos Edith, Reichenspurner Hermann, Blankenberg Stefan, Conradi Lenard, Schäfer Ulrich. Comparative analysis of balloon- versus mechanically-expandable transcatheter heart valves considering landing zone calcification.. Journal of cardiology. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.09.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.