MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · No to shinkei = Brain and nerve · 1979

[Sphenoethmoidal meningoencephalocele associated with agenesis of corpus callosum and median cleft lip and palate--report of two cases (author's transl)].

Sakoda K, Uozumi T, Hirakawa K, Harada Y, Chikuie S, Sasaki U, Ibuki Y

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Two cases of sphenoethmoidal meningoencephalocele are reported. Patients are a 1 year 7 month old boy and a 3 year old boy. Although sphenoethmoidal meningoencephalocele is reasonably classified as a type of basal meningoencephalocele, the authors could not find out any reports on cases designated as such. The reason must be in difficulty to differentiate the sphenoethmoidal type from the transsphenoidal type. Authors could differentiate them using CT scan. Two other cases were found in cases reported as transsphenoidal type. Further, it is assumed that these four cases including our two cases were accompanied with agenesis of corpus callosum and median cleft lip and palate. Despite the fact that the respective anomalies are rare, they are completely the same, which signifies the possibility that 1) sphenoethmoidal meningoencephalocele, 2) agenesis of corpus callosum and 3) median cleft lip and palate are a single unit of congenital anomalies. It probably should be considered that the cause for these malformations were present even before the formation of the lips which takes place earliest, that is, sixth week of gestation.

Для цитирования: Sakoda K, Uozumi T, Hirakawa K, Harada Y, Chikuie S, Sasaki U, Ibuki Y. [Sphenoethmoidal meningoencephalocele associated with agenesis of corpus callosum and median cleft lip and palate--report of two cases (author's transl)].. No to shinkei = Brain and nerve. 1979.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.