Analysis of 398 cases of intradural spinal tumor resection with primary dural closure: surgical outcomes based on the suture material.

OBJECTIVE

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak after resection of intradural spinal tumors (IST) represents a significant postoperative challenge. Although various dura suture techniques and materials have been explored experimentally, direct clinical comparative studies are lacking. This study evaluated the effectiveness of specific suture materials in primary dural closure post-IST resection and identified associated risk factors for CSF leak.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent IST resection surgery at a single institution from January 2012 to February 2021. Patients were categorized on the basis of the dura suture materials used. Eligibility for the study required a posterior midline surgical approach, primary dural closure after durotomy, and absence of closed-suction drainage.

RESULTS

Of 398 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the overall CSF leak-related surgical complication rate was 4.27% (17/398). The sutures used were 6-0 Prolene for 163 patients and 5-0 silk for 235 patients. Significant differences were observed between the suture groups in the CSF leak rate (Prolene 1.8% vs silk 6.0%, p = 0.046), lumbar drainage insertion rate (Prolene 0.6% vs silk 4.3%, p = 0.031), and length of postoperative bed rest (Prolene 1.07 days vs silk 3.25 days, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicated a significant association of CSF leak with the use of 5-0 silk (OR 4.11, p = 0.006) and revision surgical procedures (OR 6.73, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical complications related to CSF leaks were significantly lower with the use of 6-0 Prolene sutures compared to 5-0 silk sutures in primary dural closure after IST resection.