MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jht.2016.07.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists · 2016

A retrospective cohort study of QuickDASH scores for common acute trauma conditions presenting for hand therapy.

Southam Mikayla, Driessens Susan, Burton Christopher, Pope Rodney, Thurnwald Penelope

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION

The QuickDASH outcome measure is a valid and reliable measurement tool for assessing disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand.

PURPOSE OF STUDY: There is limited literature providing typical QuickDASH scores for upper limb conditions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the QuickDASH scores typically observed in specific upper limb pathologies.

METHODS

This study examined QuickDASH scores for acute trauma conditions presenting for hand therapy. A sample of 481 patient cases were identified, across five upper limb conditions involving a flexor or extensor tendon injury or repair, distal radius fracture, metacarpal fracture, or complex trauma.

RESULTS

Typical scores were determined at initial and final therapy sessions for these upper limb conditions.

CONCLUSION

The summary data from different diagnostic subgroups provides comparison data for clinicians to use when making comparisons, or setting goals.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Для цитирования: Southam Mikayla, Driessens Susan, Burton Christopher, Pope Rodney, Thurnwald Penelope. A retrospective cohort study of QuickDASH scores for common acute trauma conditions presenting for hand therapy.. Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.07.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.