MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2340/16501977-2130

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2016

Mirror therapy for distal radial fractures: A pilot randomized controlled study.

Bayon-Calatayud Manuel, Benavente-Valdepeñas Ana Maria, Del Prado Vazquez-Muñoz Maria

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To investigate the efficacy of mirror therapy in reducing pain and disability in patients with distal radial fractures. Pilot randomized controlled study. Twenty-two patients with closed distal radial fracture. Patients were randomly assigned to experimental (= 11) or control (= 11) groups. Researchers were blinded to group allocation. Both groups received conventional physiotherapy. In addition, the experimental group had 15 sessions of mirror therapy (a daily session, 30 min). The control group received the same amount of conventional occupational therapy. Assessment was made from baseline to post-treatment. Pain was measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Active wrist extension and Quick-DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) were used to assess functional recovery. Pain, disability, and range of motion improved for both groups after intervention. No significant post-treatment differences were found between groups in Quick-DASH (= 0.409), active wrist extension (= 0.191) and VAS scores (= 0.807). There was no significant difference in active wrist extension between groups. Mirror therapy was not superior to conventional occupational therapy in reducing pain and disability.

Для цитирования: Bayon-Calatayud Manuel, Benavente-Valdepeñas Ana Maria, Del Prado Vazquez-Muñoz Maria. Mirror therapy for distal radial fractures: A pilot randomized controlled study.. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2016. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2130.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.