MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12659/ajcr.907291

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of case reports · 2018

A Case of Right-Sided Direct Carotid Cavernous Fistula: A Diagnostic Challenge.

Latt Htun, Kyaw Kyaw, Yin Htwe Htwe, Kapoor Deepak, Aung Sammy San Myint, Islam Raheel

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND Carotid cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are rare potentially sight-threatening abnormal connections between carotid artery and cavernous sinus. CASE REPORT We report a case of CCF in an 83-year-old female, who presented with swollen and painful right eye. The patient was initially treated with empiric antibiotics for suspected peri-orbital cellulitis, as noted clinically and in computed tomography (CT) orbits. However, lack of clinical improvement, physical finding of orbital bruit/thrill, and enlarged superior ophthalmic vein in magnetic resonance (MR) orbits suggest alternate diagnoses. Eventually, CT angiogram (CTA) and carotid-arteriography confirmed the diagnosis of right-sided direct CCF, which was subsequently treated with endovascular embolization. Not only does this case highlight the importance of CCF, which could be a differential diagnosis of swollen red eye, it also addresses the vital importance of physical examination in modern medicine despite the seemingly promising technologies. CONCLUSIONS Internists should have a low threshold of clinical suspicion for CCF in a patient with swollen red eyes in order to provide timely and proper management.

Для цитирования: Latt Htun, Kyaw Kyaw, Yin Htwe Htwe, Kapoor Deepak, Aung Sammy San Myint, Islam Raheel. A Case of Right-Sided Direct Carotid Cavernous Fistula: A Diagnostic Challenge.. The American journal of case reports. 2018. DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.907291.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.