MedElevator
Войти в исследования Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2000
[Modelled analysis of the effect of cystocele reduction with vaginal pack on miction in women with grade IV cystocele].
Клиническое исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Valentini F, Zimmern P E, Besson G, Nelson P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of reduction of a cystocele by vaginal pack on the voiding of women with grade IV cystocele.
METHODS: Two successive pressure-flow analyses were performed in a series of 21 patients: the first after insertion of a vaginal pack to reduce the cystocele, and the second after removal of the pack. The VBN method was applied to analyse uroflowmetries, allowing evaluation of two parameters for each uroflowmetry: one reflecting the urethra and the other reflecting the detrusor.
RESULTS: Only 14 patients were able to perform the 2 uroflowmetries in a single stream with a volume greater than 100 ml. The vaginal pack improved the urethral parameter in 10 patients, but had no effect in the other 4 patients; it did not alter detrusor function. The urethral parameter was improved in patients whose obstruction was relieved according to the urodynamic criterion.
CONCLUSIONS: Modelized analysis of pressure-flow analyses with and without a vaginal pack supports the conclusions of urodynamic tests concerning the preoperative status of patients with high grade cystocele by identifying those patients in whom the cystocele affects bladder emptying.
METHODS: Two successive pressure-flow analyses were performed in a series of 21 patients: the first after insertion of a vaginal pack to reduce the cystocele, and the second after removal of the pack. The VBN method was applied to analyse uroflowmetries, allowing evaluation of two parameters for each uroflowmetry: one reflecting the urethra and the other reflecting the detrusor.
RESULTS: Only 14 patients were able to perform the 2 uroflowmetries in a single stream with a volume greater than 100 ml. The vaginal pack improved the urethral parameter in 10 patients, but had no effect in the other 4 patients; it did not alter detrusor function. The urethral parameter was improved in patients whose obstruction was relieved according to the urodynamic criterion.
CONCLUSIONS: Modelized analysis of pressure-flow analyses with and without a vaginal pack supports the conclusions of urodynamic tests concerning the preoperative status of patients with high grade cystocele by identifying those patients in whom the cystocele affects bladder emptying.