The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2013
A comparison of three tocolytics for preterm labor: a randomized clinical trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Klauser Chad K, Briery Christian M, Martin Rick W, Langston LeDon, Magann Everett F, Morrison John C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and maternal side effects of nifedipine (N), magnesium sulfate (M), and indomethacin (I) for acute tocolysis.
METHODS: In this single center randomized trial, women in preterm labor 24-32 weeks' gestation received intravenous M, oral N, or I suppositories. The primary outcomes of interest were arrest of preterm labor (>48 h, ≥7 days), gestational age at delivery, and maternal side effects.
RESULTS: Over a 38-month period, 301 women were allocated to receive M (90), N (114), or I (90). Gestational age at delivery (p = 0.551) or arrest of labor >48 h, >7 days were similar between the three groups (p = 0.199, 0.654). Hypotension and tachycardia were more common in N patients compared to women receiving M or I (p = 0.003, 0.009). Patients receiving I had more fetal ductal constriction or oligohydramnios compared to M or N (p = 0.001, 0.020) but, I women were tested more often. There was one case of pulmonary edema in the M group and one with plural effusion in the N group.
CONCLUSION: There were no differences in efficacy or in major maternal safety issues between the three tocolytic agents. Since there is no FDA approved tocolytic to treat preterm labor, clinicians should use the tocolytic that has afforded them the best results with the least maternal/neonatal side effects.
METHODS: In this single center randomized trial, women in preterm labor 24-32 weeks' gestation received intravenous M, oral N, or I suppositories. The primary outcomes of interest were arrest of preterm labor (>48 h, ≥7 days), gestational age at delivery, and maternal side effects.
RESULTS: Over a 38-month period, 301 women were allocated to receive M (90), N (114), or I (90). Gestational age at delivery (p = 0.551) or arrest of labor >48 h, >7 days were similar between the three groups (p = 0.199, 0.654). Hypotension and tachycardia were more common in N patients compared to women receiving M or I (p = 0.003, 0.009). Patients receiving I had more fetal ductal constriction or oligohydramnios compared to M or N (p = 0.001, 0.020) but, I women were tested more often. There was one case of pulmonary edema in the M group and one with plural effusion in the N group.
CONCLUSION: There were no differences in efficacy or in major maternal safety issues between the three tocolytic agents. Since there is no FDA approved tocolytic to treat preterm labor, clinicians should use the tocolytic that has afforded them the best results with the least maternal/neonatal side effects.