Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research · 2020
Reconstruction of acquired lip defects: Ten-year experience at a tertiary care center.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dadhich Anuj, Shah Seemit, Nilesh Kumar, Saluja Haish, Girhe Vijaykuamar, Agarwal Sumit, Mishra Madan
Аннотация
AIM: The purpose of this paper is to describe different acquired conditions necessitating lip reconstruction and present our ten-years' experience in managing the same at a tertiary care hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of patients undergoing reconstruction of acquired lip defects from January 2009 to December 2019 were analyzed for demographic details, etiology, extent of defect, reconstruction option used, outcome and complications.
RESULTS: 89 patients underwent lip reconstruction after excision of malignant tumors (81%), vascular malformations (12%) and traumatic injuries (7%). Mucosal and cutaneous lip defects were seen in 8 (9%) and 3 (3%) patients respectively, which were treated by primary closure, local advancement flap and tongue flap. Full thickness defects involving less than 1/3rd of lip (36%) and involving up to 2/3rd of lip (33%) were treated by primary closure, Abbe, Abbe Estlander flap and Karapenzic, Bernard Webster & peri-alar crescentic flaps respectively. Sub-total lip defects were repaired using distant and free vascularized flaps. All the localized cutaneous/mucosal defect repair healed uneventfully. Complications associated full thickness defect reconstruction included reduced stoma, flap necrosis and hypertrophic scar.
CONCLUSIONS: Repair of localized cutaneous/mucosal defects of lip are simple with no significant documented complication. However, full thickness tissue loss necessities careful surgical planning. The choice of surgical technique depends on the extent of lip length lost. While Karapandzic flap was most commonly utilized to reconstruct lip defect involving up to 2/3rd of the lip, radial forearm flap was a choice in managing subtotal lip tissue loss.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of patients undergoing reconstruction of acquired lip defects from January 2009 to December 2019 were analyzed for demographic details, etiology, extent of defect, reconstruction option used, outcome and complications.
RESULTS: 89 patients underwent lip reconstruction after excision of malignant tumors (81%), vascular malformations (12%) and traumatic injuries (7%). Mucosal and cutaneous lip defects were seen in 8 (9%) and 3 (3%) patients respectively, which were treated by primary closure, local advancement flap and tongue flap. Full thickness defects involving less than 1/3rd of lip (36%) and involving up to 2/3rd of lip (33%) were treated by primary closure, Abbe, Abbe Estlander flap and Karapenzic, Bernard Webster & peri-alar crescentic flaps respectively. Sub-total lip defects were repaired using distant and free vascularized flaps. All the localized cutaneous/mucosal defect repair healed uneventfully. Complications associated full thickness defect reconstruction included reduced stoma, flap necrosis and hypertrophic scar.
CONCLUSIONS: Repair of localized cutaneous/mucosal defects of lip are simple with no significant documented complication. However, full thickness tissue loss necessities careful surgical planning. The choice of surgical technique depends on the extent of lip length lost. While Karapandzic flap was most commonly utilized to reconstruct lip defect involving up to 2/3rd of the lip, radial forearm flap was a choice in managing subtotal lip tissue loss.