American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2022
Nasal characteristics in patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fan Yi, Chen Gui, He Wei, Zhang Nan, Song Guangying, Matthews Harold, Claes Peter, Xu Tianmin
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: To objectively quantify nasal characteristics of patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism and to evaluate the association between nasal asymmetry and dentofacial abnormalities.
METHODS: Ninety adult patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism were included. Images were captured during pretreatment using 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. A total of 7160 uniformly sampled quasi-landmarks were automatically identified on each facial image to establish correspondence using a template mapping technique. Fifteen commonly used anatomic landmarks were automatically located on each image through barycentric to Cartesian coordinate conversion. Nasal characteristics and asymmetry were quantified by anthropometric linear distances, angular measurements, and surface-based analysis. The degree of the nasal, chin, and periorbital asymmetry in a patient was scored using a root-mean-squared error between the left and right sides. The correlations among these regional asymmetries were evaluated.
RESULTS: The nasal tip was significantly shifted to the deviated side of the chin, and the nostrils were asymmetrical. The location and degree of nasal asymmetry varied among patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism. The level of nasal asymmetry was significantly and positively correlated with chin and periorbital asymmetry.
CONCLUSIONS: Nasal asymmetry is present in asymmetric mandibular prognathism patients. Furthermore, it is positively associated with periorbital deviation and chin deviation. Individualized nasal asymmetry evaluation should be performed, and clinicians should inform patients about preexisting nasal asymmetry.
METHODS: Ninety adult patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism were included. Images were captured during pretreatment using 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. A total of 7160 uniformly sampled quasi-landmarks were automatically identified on each facial image to establish correspondence using a template mapping technique. Fifteen commonly used anatomic landmarks were automatically located on each image through barycentric to Cartesian coordinate conversion. Nasal characteristics and asymmetry were quantified by anthropometric linear distances, angular measurements, and surface-based analysis. The degree of the nasal, chin, and periorbital asymmetry in a patient was scored using a root-mean-squared error between the left and right sides. The correlations among these regional asymmetries were evaluated.
RESULTS: The nasal tip was significantly shifted to the deviated side of the chin, and the nostrils were asymmetrical. The location and degree of nasal asymmetry varied among patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism. The level of nasal asymmetry was significantly and positively correlated with chin and periorbital asymmetry.
CONCLUSIONS: Nasal asymmetry is present in asymmetric mandibular prognathism patients. Furthermore, it is positively associated with periorbital deviation and chin deviation. Individualized nasal asymmetry evaluation should be performed, and clinicians should inform patients about preexisting nasal asymmetry.