European radiology · 2021
Evaluation of whole axillary status with lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with breast cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jin Lifang, Wang Ruitao, Zhuang Lingling, Jin Yubiao, Sun Xing, Jia Chao, Lin Lizhou, Shi Qiusheng, Zhang Weituo, Du Lianfang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the whole axillary status of patients with breast cancer by lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS).
METHODS: LCEUS was applied for 169 patients with suspected breast cancer. Abnormal patterns in lymphatic channels, sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), and non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes were investigated. The signs of distorted, attenuated, netted, or interrupted lymphatic channels, defective-filling or no-filling SLNs, and the appearance of non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes were designated as features of axillary metastasis. A positive outcome was given when any of the abnormal patterns was found in the LCEUS. The diagnostic efficiencies were calculated to differentiate the axillary lymphatic status using LCEUS for the whole axilla, compared with conventional ultrasound (US) and LCEUS for SLNs.
RESULTS: The LCEUS procedure was successfully performed for 157 breast cancer patients with axillary dissection. Compared to normal axillae, abnormal patterns had a significantly higher frequency in metastatic axillae (p = 0.000). Using conventional US to evaluate the whole axillae, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 69.1%, 71.9%, and 70.7%, respectively. When LCEUS was used for SLN evaluation to predict the whole axilla, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 66.2%, 89.9%, and 79.6%, respectively. When LCEUS was used as the whole axillary evaluation method, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 76.5%, 86.5%, and 82.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: LCEUS can be an accurate method to observe the whole axillae in breast cancer patients. Lymphatic channels, SLNs, and non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes constitute the LCEUS for whole axillary evaluation.
KEY POINTS: • LCEUS can be an accurate method to observe the whole axillae in breast cancer patients. • Three aspects in the LCEUS for whole axillary evaluation are the lymphatic channels, sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), and non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes. • Signs of distorted, attenuated, netted, or interrupted lymphatic channels, defective-filling or no-filling SLNs, and the appearance of non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes were considered as features of axillary metastasis.
METHODS: LCEUS was applied for 169 patients with suspected breast cancer. Abnormal patterns in lymphatic channels, sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), and non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes were investigated. The signs of distorted, attenuated, netted, or interrupted lymphatic channels, defective-filling or no-filling SLNs, and the appearance of non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes were designated as features of axillary metastasis. A positive outcome was given when any of the abnormal patterns was found in the LCEUS. The diagnostic efficiencies were calculated to differentiate the axillary lymphatic status using LCEUS for the whole axilla, compared with conventional ultrasound (US) and LCEUS for SLNs.
RESULTS: The LCEUS procedure was successfully performed for 157 breast cancer patients with axillary dissection. Compared to normal axillae, abnormal patterns had a significantly higher frequency in metastatic axillae (p = 0.000). Using conventional US to evaluate the whole axillae, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 69.1%, 71.9%, and 70.7%, respectively. When LCEUS was used for SLN evaluation to predict the whole axilla, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 66.2%, 89.9%, and 79.6%, respectively. When LCEUS was used as the whole axillary evaluation method, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 76.5%, 86.5%, and 82.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: LCEUS can be an accurate method to observe the whole axillae in breast cancer patients. Lymphatic channels, SLNs, and non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes constitute the LCEUS for whole axillary evaluation.
KEY POINTS: • LCEUS can be an accurate method to observe the whole axillae in breast cancer patients. • Three aspects in the LCEUS for whole axillary evaluation are the lymphatic channels, sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), and non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes. • Signs of distorted, attenuated, netted, or interrupted lymphatic channels, defective-filling or no-filling SLNs, and the appearance of non-enhanced but abnormal lymph nodes were considered as features of axillary metastasis.