BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2002
Secondary colposuspension: results of a prospective study from a tertiary referral centre.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thakar Ranee, Stanton Stuart, Prodigalidad Lisa, den Boon Jan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of secondary colposuspension in women with recurrent urinary stress incontinence.
DESIGN: Prospective cross sectional observational study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral urogynaecology unit.
POPULATION: Fifty-six women with recurrent stress incontinence.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determine prognostic factors that may affect the outcome of surgery, long term subjective and objective success rates and identify complications of secondary colposuspension.
RESULTS: The mean age was 54 years (range 34-83) and the median parity was 3 (range 1-5). The median length of follow up was four years (range 1.01-7.07). Forty-two (75%) women had genuine stress incontinence and 14 (25%) had mixed incontinence on subtracted cystometry. The subjective cure rate was 71% and the objective cure rate was 80% and, as per Kaplan-Meier life time analysis, 65% had not failed surgery five years after the operation. The complication rate was low. However at follow up, eight women had required a posterior colporrhaphy for rectocele and three had a sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse. Another eight women required further treatment for stress incontinence (seven urethral bulking agents and one tension-free vaginal tape). There was no correlation of the outcome to age, past hysterectomy, number of previous incontinence procedures, parity, body mass index or blood loss at operation.
CONCLUSION: Colposuspension after failed continence surgery has a good outcome with a low complication rate, but many still require further surgery for prolapse.
DESIGN: Prospective cross sectional observational study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral urogynaecology unit.
POPULATION: Fifty-six women with recurrent stress incontinence.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determine prognostic factors that may affect the outcome of surgery, long term subjective and objective success rates and identify complications of secondary colposuspension.
RESULTS: The mean age was 54 years (range 34-83) and the median parity was 3 (range 1-5). The median length of follow up was four years (range 1.01-7.07). Forty-two (75%) women had genuine stress incontinence and 14 (25%) had mixed incontinence on subtracted cystometry. The subjective cure rate was 71% and the objective cure rate was 80% and, as per Kaplan-Meier life time analysis, 65% had not failed surgery five years after the operation. The complication rate was low. However at follow up, eight women had required a posterior colporrhaphy for rectocele and three had a sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse. Another eight women required further treatment for stress incontinence (seven urethral bulking agents and one tension-free vaginal tape). There was no correlation of the outcome to age, past hysterectomy, number of previous incontinence procedures, parity, body mass index or blood loss at operation.
CONCLUSION: Colposuspension after failed continence surgery has a good outcome with a low complication rate, but many still require further surgery for prolapse.