Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2014
Prospective cohort study of carotid intima-media thickness after irradiation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wilbers Joyce, Hoebers Frank J, Boogerd Willem, van Werkhoven Erik D, Nowee Marlies E, Hart Guus, Bartelink Harry, van Dijk Ewoud J, Kappelle Arnoud C, Dorresteijn Lucille D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery vasculopathy is a potential long-term complication after radiotherapy (RT) of the neck, resulting in cerebrovascular events. The underlying pathophysiology is not well understood and early markers are lacking. We aimed to study whether RT of the neck is associated with increase in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and stroke in the first 2 years after RT in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study patients treated with RT of the neck were assessed for measurement of IMT before and 2 years after RT. Endpoints were changed in IMT and incidence of first-ever stroke.
RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2008 we included 69 patients (median age, 57 years [25%-75% quartile, 51-64 years], median dose of RT 66 Gy [interquartile range, 60-70]) with baseline and follow-up measurement of IMT. Median IMT at baseline and follow-up was .60 and .62 mm (ratio of geometric means 1.01; 95% confidence interval, .96-1.08; P = .63). Four of 69 patients suffered from a stroke. Mean interval from RT to stroke was 6.8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no increase of carotid IMT in the first 2 years after RT of the neck in patients treated for HNC. This indicates that the IMT is not a reliable early marker for postirradiation vasculopathy. However, a high rate of strokes was observed. A longer follow-up period is needed to find the starting point of RT-induced vascular changes.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study patients treated with RT of the neck were assessed for measurement of IMT before and 2 years after RT. Endpoints were changed in IMT and incidence of first-ever stroke.
RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2008 we included 69 patients (median age, 57 years [25%-75% quartile, 51-64 years], median dose of RT 66 Gy [interquartile range, 60-70]) with baseline and follow-up measurement of IMT. Median IMT at baseline and follow-up was .60 and .62 mm (ratio of geometric means 1.01; 95% confidence interval, .96-1.08; P = .63). Four of 69 patients suffered from a stroke. Mean interval from RT to stroke was 6.8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no increase of carotid IMT in the first 2 years after RT of the neck in patients treated for HNC. This indicates that the IMT is not a reliable early marker for postirradiation vasculopathy. However, a high rate of strokes was observed. A longer follow-up period is needed to find the starting point of RT-induced vascular changes.