Journal of surgical oncology · 2026
Hospital Volume and Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure After Major Hepatectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peters Xane D, Brajcich Brian C, Ko Bona, Valukas Catherine, Janczewski Lauren M, Ko Clifford Y, Merkow Ryan P, Pitt Henry A, Bentrem David J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) following major hepatectomy (MH) increases the risk of morbidity and death. The relationship between institutional MH volume, PHLF, and outcomes is not well characterized.
METHODS: Adults undergoing MH from 2014 to 2021 in the ACS NSQIP hepatectomy-targeted database were included. Rates of PHLF were compared based on hospital-level annual MH volume. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association between volume, PHLF grade, and outcomes.
RESULTS: Across 11,167 patients, PHLF incidence was 3.7% in low-volume, 5.5% in low-medium volume, 6.9% in medium-high volume, 11.8% in high-volume centers (p < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for morbidity in grade B/C PHLF compared to those without PHLF was elevated in both lower-volume centers (quartiles 1-3), (11.2 [7.04-17.70]) and in high-volume centers, (8.47 [6.06-11.85]).
CONCLUSION: Higher annual major hepatectomy volume is associated with increased PHLF, which may be a function of complex disease treated at these institutions. PHLF precedes other adverse events affecting both high and low volume institutions. PHLF is an important target for quality improvement.
METHODS: Adults undergoing MH from 2014 to 2021 in the ACS NSQIP hepatectomy-targeted database were included. Rates of PHLF were compared based on hospital-level annual MH volume. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association between volume, PHLF grade, and outcomes.
RESULTS: Across 11,167 patients, PHLF incidence was 3.7% in low-volume, 5.5% in low-medium volume, 6.9% in medium-high volume, 11.8% in high-volume centers (p < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for morbidity in grade B/C PHLF compared to those without PHLF was elevated in both lower-volume centers (quartiles 1-3), (11.2 [7.04-17.70]) and in high-volume centers, (8.47 [6.06-11.85]).
CONCLUSION: Higher annual major hepatectomy volume is associated with increased PHLF, which may be a function of complex disease treated at these institutions. PHLF precedes other adverse events affecting both high and low volume institutions. PHLF is an important target for quality improvement.