MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0028-3886.332267

Медицинская библиотека · Neurology India · 2021

Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus - Patient Evaluation and Decision-Making.

Vibha Deepti, Tripathi Manjari

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) presents with the triad of gait difficulty, urinary incontinence, and cognitive decline. However, the definitive diagnosis and treatment may be challenging at times due to secondary causes of NPH (sNPH) versus idiopathic NPH (iNPH), co-existing other degenerative, vascular, and metabolic causes of similar clinical presentations.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this narrative review is to outline the approach to patient evaluation and decision-making in cases where there is clinical suspicion of iNPH.

METHODS

This review article intends to provide a practical approach to the patients with a suspected diagnosis of iNPH.

RESULTS

The cardinal clinical features with a guide from investigations like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, and CSF tap assessment have been outlined. The interpretation of conflicting MRI brain findings or CSF analysis may need resolution by further tests. The decision algorithm following the examination and investigations has been included to address the dilemma in the case of a non-supportive MRI and/or CSF tap test.

CONCLUSION

iNPH is a treatable cause of the cognitive decline and gait disorder. While neurodegenerative causes may accompany iNPH, any patient with improvement after CSF drainage deserves therapeutic intervention.

Для цитирования: Vibha Deepti, Tripathi Manjari. Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus - Patient Evaluation and Decision-Making.. Neurology India. 2021. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.332267.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.