International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2006
The effects of analytical factors on second trimester risk estimations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Serdar M A, Tütüncü L, Olgun A, Haşimi A, Ozgurtaş T, Erbil M K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Triple test with measured maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and unconjugated estriol combination as a routine procedure for fetal Down's syndrome, trisomy 18 and neural tube defect screening has some intrinsic problems, such as precision. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of analytical variation of triple test on prenatal risk estimation.
METHOD: Five different serum pools were prepared and triple test was performed seven times for within run and five times for between run precision determination.
RESULT: Within run and between run, precision values of risk estimations by measuring the same sample for Triple test were calculated to be 7.9-21.4% and 14.1-31.0% for trisomy 21, 13.2-23.7% and 14.2-15.1% for trisomy 18, 47.2 and 42.0 % for neural tube defect, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated that analytical variations have great impact on second trimester risk estimation procedures; therefore, triple test analyses should be carried out in laboratories using strict internal and external quality control programs. Moreover, triple test results should always be interpreted by considering analytical and biological variations.
METHOD: Five different serum pools were prepared and triple test was performed seven times for within run and five times for between run precision determination.
RESULT: Within run and between run, precision values of risk estimations by measuring the same sample for Triple test were calculated to be 7.9-21.4% and 14.1-31.0% for trisomy 21, 13.2-23.7% and 14.2-15.1% for trisomy 18, 47.2 and 42.0 % for neural tube defect, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated that analytical variations have great impact on second trimester risk estimation procedures; therefore, triple test analyses should be carried out in laboratories using strict internal and external quality control programs. Moreover, triple test results should always be interpreted by considering analytical and biological variations.