IJU case reports · 2022
Combination therapy with radiation and hyperthermia-induced clinical complete response of small cell carcinoma of prostate.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kawai Noriyasu, Nagai Takashi, Naiki-Ito Aya, Iida Keitaro, Etani Toshiki, Naiki Taku, Hamamoto Shuzo, Okada Atsushi, Murai Taro, Yasui Takahiro
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Small cell carcinoma of the prostate has a poor prognosis even with standard systemic chemotherapy. We report a case, in which combination therapy with radiation and hyperthermia-induced clinical complete response.
CASE PRESENTATION: An 87-year-old man complaining of dysuria was referred to our hospital. Based on magnetic resonance imaging findings and a history of prostate cancer, a prostate biopsy was performed, and small cell carcinoma of the prostate was diagnosed. Whole-pelvis radiation therapy was administered with an additional dose to the prostate; eight cycles of hyperthermia treatment (8 MHz radiofrequency capacitive regional hyperthermia) were administered concurrently. Normalized neuron-specific enolase levels and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a complete response. A few cancer cells were seen in the post-treatment biopsy specimen, which demonstrated positive immunostaining for heat shock protein 70 and HIKESHI.
CONCLUSION: In this case, small cell carcinoma of the prostate was effectively treated with combined radiation and hyperthermia therapy.
CASE PRESENTATION: An 87-year-old man complaining of dysuria was referred to our hospital. Based on magnetic resonance imaging findings and a history of prostate cancer, a prostate biopsy was performed, and small cell carcinoma of the prostate was diagnosed. Whole-pelvis radiation therapy was administered with an additional dose to the prostate; eight cycles of hyperthermia treatment (8 MHz radiofrequency capacitive regional hyperthermia) were administered concurrently. Normalized neuron-specific enolase levels and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a complete response. A few cancer cells were seen in the post-treatment biopsy specimen, which demonstrated positive immunostaining for heat shock protein 70 and HIKESHI.
CONCLUSION: In this case, small cell carcinoma of the prostate was effectively treated with combined radiation and hyperthermia therapy.