European journal of heart failure · 2024
Machine learning approach to identify phenotypes in patients with ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Monzo Luca, Bresso Emmanuel, Dickstein Kenneth, Pitt Bertram, Cleland John G F, Anker Stefan D, Lam Carolyn S P, Mehra Mandeep R, van Veldhuisen Dirk J, Greenberg Barry, Zannad Faiez, Girerd Nicolas
Аннотация
AIMS: Patients experiencing ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) represent a diverse group. We hypothesize that machine learning clustering can help separate distinctive patient phenotypes, paving the way for personalized management.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 8591 ischaemic HFrEF patients pooled from the EPHESUS and CAPRICORN trials (64 ± 12 years; 28% women) were included in this analysis. Clusters were identified using both clinical and biological variables. Association between clusters and the composite of (i) heart failure hospitalization or all-cause death, (ii) cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization or all-cause death, and (iii) major adverse CV events was assessed. The derived algorithm was applied in the COMMANDER-HF trial (n = 5022) for external validation. Five clinical distinctive clusters were identified: Cluster 1 (n = 2161) with the older patients, higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation and previous CV events; Cluster 2 (n = 1376) with the higher prevalence of older hypertensive women and smoking habit; Cluster 3 (n = 1157) with the higher prevalence of diabetes and peripheral artery disease; Cluster 4 (n = 2073) with relatively younger patients, mostly men and with the higher left ventricular ejection fraction; Cluster 5 (n = 1824) with the younger patients and lower CV events burden. Cluster membership was efficiently predicted by a random forest algorithm. Clusters were significantly associated with outcomes in derivation and validation datasets, with Cluster 1 having the highest risk, and Cluster 4 the lowest. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist benefit on CV hospitalization or all-cause death was magnified in clusters with the lowest risk of events (Clusters 2 and 4).
CONCLUSIONS: Clustering reveals distinct risk subgroups in the heterogeneous array of ischaemic HFrEF patients. This classification, accessible online, could enhance future outcome predictions for ischaemic HFrEF cases.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 8591 ischaemic HFrEF patients pooled from the EPHESUS and CAPRICORN trials (64 ± 12 years; 28% women) were included in this analysis. Clusters were identified using both clinical and biological variables. Association between clusters and the composite of (i) heart failure hospitalization or all-cause death, (ii) cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization or all-cause death, and (iii) major adverse CV events was assessed. The derived algorithm was applied in the COMMANDER-HF trial (n = 5022) for external validation. Five clinical distinctive clusters were identified: Cluster 1 (n = 2161) with the older patients, higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation and previous CV events; Cluster 2 (n = 1376) with the higher prevalence of older hypertensive women and smoking habit; Cluster 3 (n = 1157) with the higher prevalence of diabetes and peripheral artery disease; Cluster 4 (n = 2073) with relatively younger patients, mostly men and with the higher left ventricular ejection fraction; Cluster 5 (n = 1824) with the younger patients and lower CV events burden. Cluster membership was efficiently predicted by a random forest algorithm. Clusters were significantly associated with outcomes in derivation and validation datasets, with Cluster 1 having the highest risk, and Cluster 4 the lowest. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist benefit on CV hospitalization or all-cause death was magnified in clusters with the lowest risk of events (Clusters 2 and 4).
CONCLUSIONS: Clustering reveals distinct risk subgroups in the heterogeneous array of ischaemic HFrEF patients. This classification, accessible online, could enhance future outcome predictions for ischaemic HFrEF cases.