American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2020
A case of giant cell arteritis presenting with nodular posterior scleritis mimicking a choroidal mass.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Awh Caroline, Reichstein David A, Thomas Akshay S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Herein we present a case of giant cell arteritis presenting with nodular posterior scleritis and exudative retinal detachment mimicking a choroidal mass.
OBSERVATIONS: A 67-year-old man presented with sudden onset left-sided periorbital pain, blurry vision, and a choroidal lesion in the posterior pole. Despite treatment with high-dose oral prednisone for suspected nodular posterior scleritis mimicking a choroidal mass, the vision in his left eye did not recover, and he developed optic nerve pallor on exam. Further evaluation revealed an ESR of >140 mm/hr (Upper limit of normal = 20 mm/hr), a CRP of 113 mg/L (Upper limit of normal = 9 mg/L), and a temporal artery biopsy consistent with GCA. The patient was started on methotrexate and the oral steroids were slowly tapered.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the potential for GCA to present with scleritis and the potential for nodular posterior scleritis to mimic a choroidal mass, presence of a painful choroidal lesion with optic nerve swelling should prompt an evaluation for GCA to prevent permanent and bilateral vision loss.
OBSERVATIONS: A 67-year-old man presented with sudden onset left-sided periorbital pain, blurry vision, and a choroidal lesion in the posterior pole. Despite treatment with high-dose oral prednisone for suspected nodular posterior scleritis mimicking a choroidal mass, the vision in his left eye did not recover, and he developed optic nerve pallor on exam. Further evaluation revealed an ESR of >140 mm/hr (Upper limit of normal = 20 mm/hr), a CRP of 113 mg/L (Upper limit of normal = 9 mg/L), and a temporal artery biopsy consistent with GCA. The patient was started on methotrexate and the oral steroids were slowly tapered.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the potential for GCA to present with scleritis and the potential for nodular posterior scleritis to mimic a choroidal mass, presence of a painful choroidal lesion with optic nerve swelling should prompt an evaluation for GCA to prevent permanent and bilateral vision loss.