Annals of medicine · 2025
Lipid profile and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease detected by ultrasonography: is systemic inflammation a necessary mediator?
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Wenzhen, Wang Feng, Li Zhimin, Feng Wenting, Huang Hongying, Kwan Mei-Po, Tse Lap Ah
Аннотация
AIMS: To examine the relationship between lipid profile and non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), compare the predictive strengths of different lipid indicators to NAFL, and explore the possible mechanisms.
METHODS: Male workers from a baseline survey of a cohort of workers in southern China were included. Basic information was collected through face-to-face interviews. Plasma concentrations of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were determined using a blood biochemical analyzer. Liver sonography was used to identify NAFL cases. Regression models were used to calculate ORs, and examine the association between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and lipid profiles. Restricted cubic spline regression with four knots was used to examine the dose-response relationship, and mediation analysis was employed to examine the mediation effect.
RESULTS: h Among the 4016 male workers, 829 (20.64%) were diagnosed with NAFL. Compared with normal lipid profile, individuals with abnormal lipid profile had higher prevalence of NAFL (OR=2.27, 95%CI: 1.85-2.79 for TG; OR=1.45, 95%CI: 1.03-2.04 for TC; OR=1.56, 95%CI: 1.21-2.02 for HDL; OR=1.65, 95%CI: 1.25-2.18 for LDL; OR=2.28, 95%CI: 1.87-2.77 for dyslipidaemia) after adjusting for potential confounders. Dose-response relationships were observed among TG, HDL, and NAFL. In addition, no significant mediation effect of C-reactive protein (CRP) was found in the association between lipid profiles and NAFL.
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal TG, TC, HDL, and LDL levels were all positively associated with NAFL, while CRP has no mediating effect, and TG tended to be a better predictor of NAFL.
METHODS: Male workers from a baseline survey of a cohort of workers in southern China were included. Basic information was collected through face-to-face interviews. Plasma concentrations of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were determined using a blood biochemical analyzer. Liver sonography was used to identify NAFL cases. Regression models were used to calculate ORs, and examine the association between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and lipid profiles. Restricted cubic spline regression with four knots was used to examine the dose-response relationship, and mediation analysis was employed to examine the mediation effect.
RESULTS: h Among the 4016 male workers, 829 (20.64%) were diagnosed with NAFL. Compared with normal lipid profile, individuals with abnormal lipid profile had higher prevalence of NAFL (OR=2.27, 95%CI: 1.85-2.79 for TG; OR=1.45, 95%CI: 1.03-2.04 for TC; OR=1.56, 95%CI: 1.21-2.02 for HDL; OR=1.65, 95%CI: 1.25-2.18 for LDL; OR=2.28, 95%CI: 1.87-2.77 for dyslipidaemia) after adjusting for potential confounders. Dose-response relationships were observed among TG, HDL, and NAFL. In addition, no significant mediation effect of C-reactive protein (CRP) was found in the association between lipid profiles and NAFL.
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal TG, TC, HDL, and LDL levels were all positively associated with NAFL, while CRP has no mediating effect, and TG tended to be a better predictor of NAFL.