MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/cancers18182987

Медицинская библиотека · Cancers · 2026

FOLFOX Plus Bevacizumab Rechallenge Versus Regorafenib as Third-Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Role of the Oxaliplatin-Free Interval.

Ozkerim Ugur, Kınıkoglu Oguzcan, Oksuz Sila, Isik Deniz, Altintas Yunus Emre, Yildirim Sedat, Akdag Goncagul, Gecgel Aslı, Odabas Hatice, Basoglu Tugba, Turan Nedim

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background

The optimal use of chemotherapy rechallenge in later-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains uncertain. We compared third-line FOLFOX plus bevacizumab rechallenge with regorafenib and examined whether the oxaliplatin-free interval was associated with treatment outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study included 122 patients with metastatic left-sided, RAS (KRAS/NRAS) and BRAF wild-type, proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) colorectal adenocarcinoma treated between 2018 and 2025. All patients had received first-line FOLFOX plus cetuximab or panitumumab, followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab after progression. In the third-line setting, 65 patients received FOLFOX plus bevacizumab as oxaliplatin rechallenge and 57 received regorafenib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression, propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and treatment-by-oxaliplatin-free interval interaction analyses were performed.

Results

Median third-line PFS was 7.33 months with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab rechallenge and 6.17 months with regorafenib (log-rank p < 0.001). FOLFOX plus bevacizumab rechallenge was associated with a lower hazard of progression in multivariable analysis (adjusted HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.88; p = 0.009), with consistent results in the propensity score-based IPTW sensitivity analysis (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.86; p = 0.006). Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a nonlinear association between OFI and PFS (p for nonlinearity = 0.005), while flexible modeling did not provide robust evidence of a treatment-by-OFI interaction (global p = 0.806). In exploratory subgroup analyses, FOLFOX plus bevacizumab rechallenge was associated with longer PFS than regorafenib among patients with an OFI of ≥6 months (adjusted HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.65; p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed among those with an OFI of <6 months (adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.35-1.25; p = 0.199).

Conclusions

FOLFOX plus bevacizumab rechallenge was associated with longer third-line PFS than regorafenib in this selected and uniformly treated mCRC cohort. OFI was associated with PFS in a nonlinear manner, but there was no robust evidence that it modified the relative treatment effect across its continuous range. Exploratory subgroup findings based on a 6-month cutoff require external validation.

Для цитирования: Ozkerim Ugur, Kınıkoglu Oguzcan, Oksuz Sila, Isik Deniz, Altintas Yunus Emre, Yildirim Sedat, Akdag Goncagul, Gecgel Aslı, Odabas Hatice, Basoglu Tugba, Turan Nedim. FOLFOX Plus Bevacizumab Rechallenge Versus Regorafenib as Third-Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Role of the Oxaliplatin-Free Interval.. Cancers. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/cancers18182987.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.