Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase elevation in suspected physical abuse: Can the threshold to obtain an abdominal computed tomography be raised?

BACKGROUND: Identification of abdominal injury (AI) in children with concern for physical abuse is important, as it can provide important medical and forensic information. Current recommendations are to obtain screening liver function tests (LFTs) in all children with suspected physical abuse and an abdominal computed tomography (CT) when the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is >80 IU/L. This threshold to obtain an abdominal CT is lower than general trauma guidelines, which use a cutoff of AST >200 IU/L or ALT >125 IU/L.

METHODS: This was a retrospective review of children aged 0 to 60 months at a single pediatric tertiary care center who were evaluated for physical abuse and had AST or ALT >80 IU/L. Subjects were then stratified into two groups: midrange (AST ≤200 IU/L and ALT ≤125 IU/L) and high-range (AST >200 IU/L and/or ALT >125 IU/L) LFTs.

RESULTS: Abdominal CTs were performed in 55% (131 of 237) of subjects, 38% (50 of 131) with midrange LFTs and 62% (81 of 131) with high-range LFTs. Abdominal injury was identified in 19.8% (26 of 131) of subjects. Subjects with AI were older than those without AI (mean [SD] age, 18.7 [12.5] vs. 11.6 [12.2] months; p = 0.009). The highest yield of abdominal CTs positive for AI was in the group with high-range LFTs with signs or symptoms of AI at 52.0% (13 of 25; 95% confidence interval, 31.3-72.2%). The negative predictive value of having midrange LFTs and no signs or symptoms of AI was 100% (95% confidence interval, 97.0-100%).

CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that abdominal CT may not be necessary in children being evaluated for physical abuse who have AST ≤200 IU/L and ALT ≤125 IU/L and do not have signs or symptoms of AI. This could limit the number of abdominal CTs performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Test/Criteria; Level IV.