Trends in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Predominant Indications and the Most Commonly Employed Implant Designs.

Background

Over the past few decades, shoulder arthroplasty has evolved rapidly, driven by a growing demand for surgical solutions to degenerative, traumatic, and irreparable rotator cuff-related pathologies, particularly in an aging but increasingly active population.

Objective

This narrative review aims to examine the main clinical indications and the most commonly used implant designs, highlighting differences in functional outcomes, complication rates, and revision rates between anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).

Methods

Articles published between 2011 and 2025 were selected through PubMed and the Australian Joint Replacement Registry reports from 2023 and 2024. The included studies comprised randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses involving adult patients treated for primary osteoarthritis, proximal humerus fractures, and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Results

ATSA remains the preferred option in younger patients with an intact rotator cuff, due to superior outcomes in mobility and prosthesis longevity. However, glenoid component loosening remains a significant limitation. Initially reserved for irreparable cuff tears and complex fractures, RTSA has seen a progressive expansion of its indications, offering lower revision rates and satisfactory functional results, particularly in elderly patients. Recent prosthetic innovations include stemless implants, augmented glenoid components, and convertible platforms.

Conclusions

The choice between ATSA and RTSA should be individualized, based on patient-specific factors such as age, rotator cuff integrity, functional demands, and bone quality. Advances in implant materials and design, together with improved patient selection, have significantly enhanced clinical outcomes.