Journal of gastroenterology · 2026
Clinical significance of gadoxetate sodium-enhanced MRI for detecting liver metastasis in patients with pancreatic cancer: decadal real-world data analysis in Japan.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oba Atsushi, Taguchi Tomoyuki, Fujikawa Naoto, Okami Suguru, Tsuji Takashi, Michel Alexander, Goshima Satoshi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Precise, early diagnosis of liver metastasis improves clinical outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer. While gadoxetate sodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) may offer additional benefits in detecting liver metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer, it is still unclear whether the addition of this imaging modality to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) confers clinical benefits regarding prognosis and access to appropriate treatments. The objective is to evaluate the treatment pathway of patients with or without EOB-MRI after a pancreatic cancer diagnosis and examine whether the addition of EOB-MRI is associated with improved survival.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a Japanese hospital-based administrative database. Patients aged ≥ 18 years and diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between 2011 and 2021 with any record of CE-CT or MRI were included. Patients were stratified based on a record of EOB-MRI (EOB-MRI vs. non-EOB-MRI). Main outcomes were treatment pathway and overall survival (OS). OS was compared between the EOB-MRI and non-EOB-MRI groups using Cox proportional hazard regression models in the propensity-score-matched cohort.
RESULTS: A total of 39,624 patients were included. The proportion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased to 13.4% during recent years (2019-2021) in the EOB-MRI group versus 7.8% in the non-EOB-MRI group. Significantly longer OS in the matched cohort was observed (HR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.83-0.94]) in the EOB-MRI group (1,442 days [1275-1604]) versus the non-EOB-MRI group (1,293 days [1187-1440]).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of EOB-MRI was associated with increased survival times in patients with pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a Japanese hospital-based administrative database. Patients aged ≥ 18 years and diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between 2011 and 2021 with any record of CE-CT or MRI were included. Patients were stratified based on a record of EOB-MRI (EOB-MRI vs. non-EOB-MRI). Main outcomes were treatment pathway and overall survival (OS). OS was compared between the EOB-MRI and non-EOB-MRI groups using Cox proportional hazard regression models in the propensity-score-matched cohort.
RESULTS: A total of 39,624 patients were included. The proportion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased to 13.4% during recent years (2019-2021) in the EOB-MRI group versus 7.8% in the non-EOB-MRI group. Significantly longer OS in the matched cohort was observed (HR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.83-0.94]) in the EOB-MRI group (1,442 days [1275-1604]) versus the non-EOB-MRI group (1,293 days [1187-1440]).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of EOB-MRI was associated with increased survival times in patients with pancreatic cancer.