Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2002
Rotator cuff tears: the effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Apreleva Maria, Ozbaydar Mehmet, Fitzgibbons Peter G, Warner Jon J P
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To quantitatively determine the 3-dimensional (3-D) area of the original supraspinatus insertion and compare it with the repair-site area after 4 reconstructions of a simulated supraspinatus tear.
TYPE OF STUDY: Ex vivo biomechanical study.
METHODS: The outline of the original supraspinatus insertion was obtained in 10 human cadaveric shoulders using a 3-D digitizer. A supraspinatus tear was created and 4 repair techniques were evaluated: transosseous simple suture (TOS), transosseous mattress suture (TOM), suture-anchor simple suture (SAS), suture-anchor mattress suture (SAM). The 3-D outlines of the reconstructed supraspinatus insertion were digitized after each repair. The outlines of the original supraspinatus insertion and repair areas were superimposed onto humeral geometry obtained from a laser scanner, and surface areas were calculated.
RESULTS: The original supraspinatus insertion area was larger than any of the repair-site areas (P <.05). On average, TOS provided a 20% larger repair-site area than the other repairs (P <.05). Repair-site areas were not different among TOM, SAS, or SAM repairs (P >.05) and covered 67% of the original supraspinatus insertion.
CONCLUSIONS: None of the tested repairs restored the area of the original supraspinatus insertion. The larger repair-site area of the TOS repair suggests that this technique provides better potential for healing and, ultimately, greater strength of repair.
TYPE OF STUDY: Ex vivo biomechanical study.
METHODS: The outline of the original supraspinatus insertion was obtained in 10 human cadaveric shoulders using a 3-D digitizer. A supraspinatus tear was created and 4 repair techniques were evaluated: transosseous simple suture (TOS), transosseous mattress suture (TOM), suture-anchor simple suture (SAS), suture-anchor mattress suture (SAM). The 3-D outlines of the reconstructed supraspinatus insertion were digitized after each repair. The outlines of the original supraspinatus insertion and repair areas were superimposed onto humeral geometry obtained from a laser scanner, and surface areas were calculated.
RESULTS: The original supraspinatus insertion area was larger than any of the repair-site areas (P <.05). On average, TOS provided a 20% larger repair-site area than the other repairs (P <.05). Repair-site areas were not different among TOM, SAS, or SAM repairs (P >.05) and covered 67% of the original supraspinatus insertion.
CONCLUSIONS: None of the tested repairs restored the area of the original supraspinatus insertion. The larger repair-site area of the TOS repair suggests that this technique provides better potential for healing and, ultimately, greater strength of repair.