Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2012
Role of ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis: a noninvasive, cost-effective, and widely available but underutilized diagnostic tool.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alzahrani Ali S, Ceresini Graziano, Aldasouqi Saleh A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To explore the use of ultrasonography as a diagnostic alternative to the traditional "gold standard" imaging study of nuclear scintigraphy in the evaluation of thyrotoxicosis.
METHODS: We review the relevant literature and share our own experience to highlight the promising role of ultrasonography in thyrotoxicosis. In addition, we present a diagnostic algorithm suggesting liberal use of ultrasonography in the evaluation of thyrotoxicosis.
RESULTS: Ultrasonography has proved effective not only in the differentiation of Graves disease from other types and causes of thyrotoxicosis but also in the detection of subtle thyroid nodules. The latter role is emphasized in light of the recent observation of an increased risk of occurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma in patients with Graves disease.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is a cost-effective, noninvasive, portable, and safe imaging modality in the evaluation of thyrotoxicosis, both for physiologic assessment and for detection of nonpalpable thyroid cancers that may elude identification on physical examination and nuclear imaging studies. Although thyroid scintigraphy remains a standard radiologic study, thyroid ultrasonography can be a practical alternative in many cases and the primary imaging modality in some situations such as during pregnancy and lactation and for evaluation and management of amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis.
METHODS: We review the relevant literature and share our own experience to highlight the promising role of ultrasonography in thyrotoxicosis. In addition, we present a diagnostic algorithm suggesting liberal use of ultrasonography in the evaluation of thyrotoxicosis.
RESULTS: Ultrasonography has proved effective not only in the differentiation of Graves disease from other types and causes of thyrotoxicosis but also in the detection of subtle thyroid nodules. The latter role is emphasized in light of the recent observation of an increased risk of occurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma in patients with Graves disease.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is a cost-effective, noninvasive, portable, and safe imaging modality in the evaluation of thyrotoxicosis, both for physiologic assessment and for detection of nonpalpable thyroid cancers that may elude identification on physical examination and nuclear imaging studies. Although thyroid scintigraphy remains a standard radiologic study, thyroid ultrasonography can be a practical alternative in many cases and the primary imaging modality in some situations such as during pregnancy and lactation and for evaluation and management of amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis.