Cast Immobilisation versus Wire Fixation in the Management of Middle-aged and Elderly Patients with Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures are common and traditionally these injuries are treated non-operatively. Percutaneous wiring has been recommended as simple method to provide extra stability in distal radius fractures but their exact role is uncertain. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the radiographic and functional outcomes following cast immobilisation and those following wire fixation in the management of distal radius fractures and investigate which method produced better outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective parallel case series was performed between April 2011 and April 2013 of patients over 50 years treated with either cast immobilisation or wire fixation. Both intra- and extra-articular fractures were included. Radiographic measurements were made pre-operatively and at three months follow up. The QuickDASH was recorded by postal questionnaire at a mean of 2 years.

RESULTS

159 patients were included; 85 cast immobilisation group and 74 wire fixation group. Improvement in radiological parameters was seen in both groups but this was significantly better after wire fixation ([Formula: see text]). QuickDASH scores were available in 64%; no significant difference in mean scores was seen after (p = 0.147); cast immobilisation 27.1 and wire fixation 26.6.

CONCLUSIONS

Cast immobilisation can produce comparable functional results to wire fixation despite worse radiological outcomes.