MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0287603

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2023

YouTube as a source of information on ectopic pregnancy: A qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Bulle Camille, Lallemant Marine, Rigori Clara, Ramanah Rajeev

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on ectopic pregnancies for the public.

METHOD: We searched for the key terms "ectopic pregnancy", "ectopic birth" and "extra uterine pregnancy" on YouTube. Each video that met the inclusion criteria was analyzed by two independent raters. Quantitative and qualitative metrics were recorded, and the videos were scored using the DISCERN instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 37 videos met the inclusion criteria. The mean overall DISCERN score was 44.5 ± 15.6. Videos had significantly a higher DISCERN score if they contained explanations on anatomy (pvalue <0.01), physiopathology (p-value <0.01), diagnosis (p-value = <0.01), treatments (p-value <0.01), symptoms (p-value <0.01), clear information (p-value <0.01), animations (p-value <0.01) and if it was a physician speaking (p-value <0.01).

CONCLUSION

YouTube videos on ectopic pregnancy have been assessed to be only fairly reliable. We identified the five best ones using the validated DISCERN instrument. While ectopic pregnancy is not uncommon, YouTube videos should be improved to provide more accurate information for the public.

Для цитирования: Bulle Camille, Lallemant Marine, Rigori Clara, Ramanah Rajeev. YouTube as a source of information on ectopic pregnancy: A qualitative and quantitative analysis.. PloS one. 2023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287603.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.