Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction · 2016
[What's the optimal time of cesarean section antibiotic prophylaxis, before skin incision or after umbilical cord clamping? A prospective randomized study].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khlifi A, Kouira M, Bannour I, Hachani F, Kehila M, Ferhi F, Bouslama A, Ben Jazia K, Fekih M, Khairi H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of antibiotics prophylaxis within 30 mins before skin incision (A) and after umbilical cord clamping (C) on the incidence of postoperative infections in patients undergoing elective caesarean section at Farhat Hached university teaching hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomised clinical trial evaluating 279 patients undergoing elective caesarean section. Patients were randomly assigned a group number that allocated them to either arm of the study. They received the same prophylactic antibiotic (cefazol® 2g) according to their allotment. They were followed up to detect infection up to 30 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was postoperative infection. The data collected were analysed with SPSS version 18.0 using univariate and bivariate analysis.
RESULTS: The risk of overall postoperative infection was not significantly lower when prophylaxis was given before skin incision (4.37 % (A) vs 9.85 % (C); P=0.07; OR=0.42 [0.15-1.12]). We also found wound infections to be significantly reduced in the pre-incision group (2.2 % [A] vs 8.45 % [C]; P=0.03; OR=0.24 [0.06-0.88]). However, there was no difference in the endometritis infectious. On the other hand, there was no negative impact on the neonatal features.
CONCLUSIONS: Giving prophylactic antibiotics before skin incision reduces risk of postoperative infection, in particular of wound infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomised clinical trial evaluating 279 patients undergoing elective caesarean section. Patients were randomly assigned a group number that allocated them to either arm of the study. They received the same prophylactic antibiotic (cefazol® 2g) according to their allotment. They were followed up to detect infection up to 30 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was postoperative infection. The data collected were analysed with SPSS version 18.0 using univariate and bivariate analysis.
RESULTS: The risk of overall postoperative infection was not significantly lower when prophylaxis was given before skin incision (4.37 % (A) vs 9.85 % (C); P=0.07; OR=0.42 [0.15-1.12]). We also found wound infections to be significantly reduced in the pre-incision group (2.2 % [A] vs 8.45 % [C]; P=0.03; OR=0.24 [0.06-0.88]). However, there was no difference in the endometritis infectious. On the other hand, there was no negative impact on the neonatal features.
CONCLUSIONS: Giving prophylactic antibiotics before skin incision reduces risk of postoperative infection, in particular of wound infections.