Choosing cesarean section over natural birth: Challenges of decision making among pregnant women with pre-eclampsia in Ado-Ekiti.

OBJECTIVE

Although Caesarean section has greatly improved obstetric care throughout the world, there is a great aversion to caesarean section in developing countries. This study was carried out to examine the rate at which pregnant women with Pre-eclampsia decide to choose caesarean section over natural birth.

STUDY

DESIGN

A descriptive study was conducted among a sample of 112 pregnant women with Pre-eclampsia, aged 18-40 years, whose gestation period has exceeded 20 weeks and are registered in the hospitals. The sample selection was purposive.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data collection was done through self-administered structured questionnaire. Data analysis was presented using simple percentages.

RESULTS

94% of respondents had no prior information about Pre-eclampsia and its associated complications. Pre-eclampsia has a prevalence rate of 12.3% among respondents in Ado-Ekiti as at the time this study was conducted. 38% of respondent favored caesarean section because they believed it is safer, less painful with little or no complications. If caesarean section is given as an only medical option for safe childbirth to respondents who preferred natural birth, 46.4% would opt for religious interventions while 10.7% would opt for traditional healthcare.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents who preferred natural birth would not choose caesarean section because of fear, cultural belief, religious beliefs and the cost. Level of education, religion and employment status were found to influence respondents' decision to choose. Hence the need to encourage research in awareness creation, patient education and best ways to assist patients decide on mode of delivery and plan on how to finance treatment.