European journal of applied physiology · 2026
Standardizing moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise doses by physiological strain: an exploratory randomized cross-over study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nuuttila Olli-Pekka, Kaikkonen Piia, Malinen Timi, Sievänen Harri, Vasankari Tommi, Kyröläinen Heikki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Current approaches to prescribing exercise intensity might not standardize physiological strain across individuals, potentially affecting training outcomes. Whether exercise guidelines applying a 1:2 duration ratio between moderate (MOD) and vigorous (VIG) activities equalize physiological strain is unclear. This exploratory study compared physiological strain and its variance across two intensities and three prescription methods.
METHODS: Thirteen habitually active males performed an incremental treadmill test as well as 40-min MOD and 20-min VIG sessions prescribed by: (1) absolute metabolic equivalents (ABS), (2) relative maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) (REL), and (3) lactate thresholds (LT). Physiological strain was estimated using excess post-exercise oxygen consumption, individualized training impulse, post-exercise heart rate variability (HRV), blood lactate, and session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE).
RESULTS: Except for sRPE, estimated physiological strain was greater during VIG than MOD (p < 0.05) across all prescription methods. A general linear mixed model estimated that equivalent strain for most outcomes would have required MOD > 55% and VIG < 72% of VO2max. According to modified Levene’s test, variance in physiological strain did not differ significantly between prescription methods in MOD. In blood lactate, the variance was higher in VIGREL than VIGLT (p = 0.025), and HRV variance was greater in VIGABS than VIGLT (p = 0.041).
CONCLUSION: The 1:2 duration ratio underestimated physiological strain of VIG sessions regardless of prescription method. Based on the observed differences in variance, the appropriate prescription method may become increasingly important at higher intensities. However, analyses indicated substantial uncertainty in the magnitude of variance, highlighting the need for large-scale studies on the topic.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00421-026-06157-1.
METHODS: Thirteen habitually active males performed an incremental treadmill test as well as 40-min MOD and 20-min VIG sessions prescribed by: (1) absolute metabolic equivalents (ABS), (2) relative maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) (REL), and (3) lactate thresholds (LT). Physiological strain was estimated using excess post-exercise oxygen consumption, individualized training impulse, post-exercise heart rate variability (HRV), blood lactate, and session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE).
RESULTS: Except for sRPE, estimated physiological strain was greater during VIG than MOD (p < 0.05) across all prescription methods. A general linear mixed model estimated that equivalent strain for most outcomes would have required MOD > 55% and VIG < 72% of VO2max. According to modified Levene’s test, variance in physiological strain did not differ significantly between prescription methods in MOD. In blood lactate, the variance was higher in VIGREL than VIGLT (p = 0.025), and HRV variance was greater in VIGABS than VIGLT (p = 0.041).
CONCLUSION: The 1:2 duration ratio underestimated physiological strain of VIG sessions regardless of prescription method. Based on the observed differences in variance, the appropriate prescription method may become increasingly important at higher intensities. However, analyses indicated substantial uncertainty in the magnitude of variance, highlighting the need for large-scale studies on the topic.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00421-026-06157-1.