Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2017
Diagnostic value of interferon-γ-induced protein of 10kDa for tuberculous pleurisy: A meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tong Xiaomeng, Lu Hongkai, Yu Min, Wang Guozhen, Han Chengwu, Cao Yongtong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The accurate diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy is still a clinical challenge. Many studies reported that interferon-γ-induced protein of 10kDa (IP-10) plays a role in diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy, but with considerable variance of results. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy of IP-10 for tuberculous pleurisy.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and other databases were searched for studies examining accuracy of pleural IP-10 for diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy. Related data were extracted and sensitivity/specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratio (PLR/NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) were performed and calculated to summarize the overall test performance.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 1382 subjects met inclusion criteria, including 715 cases of tuberculous pleurisy and 667 controls. Summary estimates of the diagnostic performance of the IP-10 for tuberculous pleurisy were listed as follows: sensitivity, 0.84 (95%CI 0.81 to 0.87); specificity, 0.90 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.92); PLR, 7.96 (95% CI 5.59 to 11.32); NLR, 0.19 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.24); DOR, 49.82 (95% CI 28.08 to 88.38); and AUC 0.94. No publication bias was detected.
CONCLUSION: Pleural IP-10 is a useful diagnostic marker for tuberculous pleurisy. Nevertheless, its result should be interpreted together with the results of conventional test and clinical information of patients.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and other databases were searched for studies examining accuracy of pleural IP-10 for diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy. Related data were extracted and sensitivity/specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratio (PLR/NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) were performed and calculated to summarize the overall test performance.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 1382 subjects met inclusion criteria, including 715 cases of tuberculous pleurisy and 667 controls. Summary estimates of the diagnostic performance of the IP-10 for tuberculous pleurisy were listed as follows: sensitivity, 0.84 (95%CI 0.81 to 0.87); specificity, 0.90 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.92); PLR, 7.96 (95% CI 5.59 to 11.32); NLR, 0.19 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.24); DOR, 49.82 (95% CI 28.08 to 88.38); and AUC 0.94. No publication bias was detected.
CONCLUSION: Pleural IP-10 is a useful diagnostic marker for tuberculous pleurisy. Nevertheless, its result should be interpreted together with the results of conventional test and clinical information of patients.