The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2014
Prognostic significance of steroid receptor positivity and adjuvant progestogen use in endometrial stromal sarcoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cade Thomas J, Quinn Michael A, Rome Robert M, Polyakov Alexander
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) in endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) has conflicting reports in the literature, and the routine use of adjuvant progestogen is of uncertain efficacy.
AIMS: To examine the prognostic significance of ER/PR positivity and of primary adjuvant progestogen use with outcome in ESS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All women with a diagnosis of ESS in our tertiary institution and associated private practices over the last 23 years were included. Primary variables were ER/PR positivity and adjuvant progestogen use. Other variables included high-grade disease and extrauterine disease. The primary outcome was survival, and the secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival (both overall and at 5 years). Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses were performed with t-test for means and chi-squared test for proportions, and multivariate analysis was used to control for age.
RESULTS: 35 women were included. ER/PR positivity was associated with a survival benefit (OR death 0.22, P = 0.02), but primary adjuvant progestogen was not. High-grade disease (OR 13, P = 0.02) and extrauterine disease (OR 8.7, P = 0.04) were associated with decreased survival. No variable significantly affected recurrence-free survival. Eight of ten cases of recurrence treated with progestogen have survived more than 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: ER/PR positivity appears to be useful for prognosis, but routine administration of primary adjuvant progestogen is not supported. There may be a role for progestogen in ER/PR positive tumours with recurrence or incomplete surgical clearance, but further research is required.
AIMS: To examine the prognostic significance of ER/PR positivity and of primary adjuvant progestogen use with outcome in ESS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All women with a diagnosis of ESS in our tertiary institution and associated private practices over the last 23 years were included. Primary variables were ER/PR positivity and adjuvant progestogen use. Other variables included high-grade disease and extrauterine disease. The primary outcome was survival, and the secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival (both overall and at 5 years). Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses were performed with t-test for means and chi-squared test for proportions, and multivariate analysis was used to control for age.
RESULTS: 35 women were included. ER/PR positivity was associated with a survival benefit (OR death 0.22, P = 0.02), but primary adjuvant progestogen was not. High-grade disease (OR 13, P = 0.02) and extrauterine disease (OR 8.7, P = 0.04) were associated with decreased survival. No variable significantly affected recurrence-free survival. Eight of ten cases of recurrence treated with progestogen have survived more than 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: ER/PR positivity appears to be useful for prognosis, but routine administration of primary adjuvant progestogen is not supported. There may be a role for progestogen in ER/PR positive tumours with recurrence or incomplete surgical clearance, but further research is required.