DOI 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.07.011
Single-center experience with percutaneous lead extraction of cardiac implantable electric devices.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The estimated incidence of infected cardiac implantable electric devices (CIED) has recently increased to 1-2% in Japan. Extraction of long-term implanted devices is generally difficult. There are few reports about lead extraction in Japan. We describe our experience with and outcomes of lead extraction using excimer lasers, mechanical sheaths, and manual extraction.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics, types of devices, and indications for extraction in 29 patients with 67 leads who required CIED lead extraction at Shinshu University Hospital between April 2014 and October 2016. Mean patient age was 71 years and 25 patients were male. The indications for device extraction were infections (n=25) and non-functioning leads (n=4).
RESULTS
A total of 67 leads (active fixation lead, n=28; passive fixation lead, n=39) had been implanted for a median duration of 6.3±5.6 years. Extractions were performed using an excimer laser sheath (n=26), laser with mechanical sheath (n=7), only mechanical sheath (Cook Vascular Inc., Leechburg, PA, USA) (n=1), and manually (n=1). The procedure was successful in all patients. There were no major or minor complications during extraction. There was no recurrence of infection after infected device extraction. Two patients were implanted with subcutaneous implantable defibrillators after extraction of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).
CONCLUSIONS
CIED lead extraction, especially of those that are adherent to the subclavian vein, can be successfully performed in Japanese subjects using an excimer laser and mechanical sheath, without complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.