The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2016
Evaluation by obstetric care providers of simulated postpartum blood loss using a collector bag: a French prospective study.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Legendre Guillaume, Richard Marion, Brun Stéphanie, Chancerel Marion, Matuszewski Sarah, Sentilhes Loic
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the most common causes of mortality in obstetrics worldwide. Accuracy in the estimated blood loss is a priority in determining appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of estimating blood loss by obstetrics care providers during simulated training sessions.
METHOD: A prospective study occurred in 2013 in a maternity ward at a teaching hospital. Simulation training sessions recreated a vaginal delivery in which six different scenarios were presented and proposed to each participant for them to estimate the blood loss (from 350 ml to 2500 ml) while using a collector bag graduated every 100 ml from 0 ml to 1500 ml. The primary endpoint was to determine if participants could accurately evaluate blood loss within a 20% error margin.
RESULTS: About 90.7% of the medical staff participated. Ninety-three to 98% of the participants were accurate in their answer depending on which volume they had to estimate. For the lowest volume (350 ml), there was 11.1% overestimation between the estimated volume of blood loss (EBV) and the real volume of blood loss (RBV). However, there was an 8.8% underestimation found for the highest volume.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the estimated blood loss for the obstetrical medical staff, using the collector bag, is more than 96%.
METHOD: A prospective study occurred in 2013 in a maternity ward at a teaching hospital. Simulation training sessions recreated a vaginal delivery in which six different scenarios were presented and proposed to each participant for them to estimate the blood loss (from 350 ml to 2500 ml) while using a collector bag graduated every 100 ml from 0 ml to 1500 ml. The primary endpoint was to determine if participants could accurately evaluate blood loss within a 20% error margin.
RESULTS: About 90.7% of the medical staff participated. Ninety-three to 98% of the participants were accurate in their answer depending on which volume they had to estimate. For the lowest volume (350 ml), there was 11.1% overestimation between the estimated volume of blood loss (EBV) and the real volume of blood loss (RBV). However, there was an 8.8% underestimation found for the highest volume.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the estimated blood loss for the obstetrical medical staff, using the collector bag, is more than 96%.