Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
Plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten and ledaborbactam in healthy male and female adults.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование I фазыРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodvold Keith A, Gotfried Mark H, de Oliveira Carlos Fernando, Lowe Kathryn, Hamed Kamal A, Litherland Karine, Engelhardt Marc, McGovern Paul C
Аннотация
Ledaborbactam etzadroxil (LED-E) is an oral prodrug of ledaborbactam, a broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor. In combination with ceftibuten (CTB), a third-generation oral cephalosporin, LED-E represents a potential oral β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor regimen for treating infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. This phase 1, single-center, open-label study evaluated intrapulmonary concentrations of ledaborbactam (LED) and CTB in healthy adults. Participants in Group 1 received five oral doses of CTB/LED-E (600 mg/600 mg) every 12 h (q12h), and participants in Group 2 received five oral doses of CTB 600 mg q12h. Following the fifth dose, participants underwent a standardized single bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Twenty-eight participants in Group 1 and six participants in Group 2 were randomized and dosed. Among participants receiving CTB/LED-E, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12) for aspirate 1 was 14,867 ng·h/mL for CTB and 14,529 ng·h/mL for LED, and for pooled aspirates 2 + 3 + 4 was 10,486 ng·h/mL and 9,809 ng·h/mL, respectively. ELF-to-unbound plasma AUC ratios were 0.341 (aspirate 1) and 0.239 (pooled aspirates 2 + 3 + 4) for CTB and 1.560 and 1.032, respectively, for LED. Participants receiving CTB alone demonstrated similar lung penetration, indicating no effect of LED on CTB exposure. Both CTB/LED-E and CTB alone were safe and well tolerated; all adverse events were mild or moderate and unrelated to study drug. These results demonstrate pulmonary penetration of CTB and LED and support further evaluation of CTB/LED-E for the treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections caused by susceptible pathogens.This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT06665555.