The New Zealand medical journal · 1993
New Zealand general practitioner referral patterns.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dovey S M, Barton G R, Tilyard M W, Gurr E
Аннотация
AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the referral patterns of general practitioners in New Zealand, for a defined list of medical conditions.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 200 general practitioners, selected from the Medical Council of New Zealand list. Responses were made on five point scales to indicate general practitioners' views on the appropriateness of referral. For each medical condition, derived from An Educational Guide for General Practice, respondents also indicated favoured agencies for referral. Cluster analysis was used on an SPSSX dataset.
RESULTS: A response rate of 87% (91.5% of eligible contacts) was achieved. The conditions for which referrals were least often made included mild hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis not requiring second line therapy, hypothyroidism, and obesity. Referral was common for rheumatoid arthritis requiring second line therapy, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, altered bowel habit with rectal bleeding, multiple sclerosis, and postmenopausal bleeding. Seventy seven different referral agencies were indicated by respondents: the most common was the general physician (13% of all agencies indicated).
CONCLUSIONS: Although there are a large number of conditions which are routinely managed only in general practice, general practitioners need to be able to refer patients to other health carers, even if only occasionally. There is a high degree of consensus as to the conditions for which referral is usually appropriate. They tend to be conditions requiring well defined investigation, treatment or management procedures which are commonly provided by centralised secondary or tertiary institutions.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 200 general practitioners, selected from the Medical Council of New Zealand list. Responses were made on five point scales to indicate general practitioners' views on the appropriateness of referral. For each medical condition, derived from An Educational Guide for General Practice, respondents also indicated favoured agencies for referral. Cluster analysis was used on an SPSSX dataset.
RESULTS: A response rate of 87% (91.5% of eligible contacts) was achieved. The conditions for which referrals were least often made included mild hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis not requiring second line therapy, hypothyroidism, and obesity. Referral was common for rheumatoid arthritis requiring second line therapy, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, altered bowel habit with rectal bleeding, multiple sclerosis, and postmenopausal bleeding. Seventy seven different referral agencies were indicated by respondents: the most common was the general physician (13% of all agencies indicated).
CONCLUSIONS: Although there are a large number of conditions which are routinely managed only in general practice, general practitioners need to be able to refer patients to other health carers, even if only occasionally. There is a high degree of consensus as to the conditions for which referral is usually appropriate. They tend to be conditions requiring well defined investigation, treatment or management procedures which are commonly provided by centralised secondary or tertiary institutions.