Differentiation of intrapancreatic accessory spleen from small hypervascular neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas: textural analysis on contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Intrapancreatic accessory spleens (IPASs) are usually misdiagnosed as pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Texture analysis is valuable in tumor detection, diagnosis, and staging.
PURPOSE: To identify the potential of texture features in differentiating IPASs from small hypervascular PNETs.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Twenty-one patients with PNETs and 13 individuals with IPASs who underwent pretreatment dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively analyzed. The routine imaging features-such as location, size, margin, cystic or solid appearance, enhancement degree and pattern, and lymph node enlargement-were recorded. Texture features, such as entropy, skewness, kurtosis, and uniformity, on contrast-enhanced images were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to differentiate IPASs from PNETs.
RESULTS
No significant differences were observed in margin, enhancement degree (arterial and portal phase), lymph node enlargement, or size between PNETs and IPASs (all P > 0.05). However, IPASs usually showed heterogeneous enhancement at the arterial phase and the same degree of enhancement as the spleen at the portal phase, both of which were greater than those of PNETs (69% vs. 35%, P = 0.06; 100% vs. 29%, P = 0.04). Entropy and uniformity were significantly different between IPASs and PNETs at moderate (1.5) and high sigma values (2.5) (both P < 0.01). ROC analysis showed that uniformity at moderate and high sigma had the highest area under the curve (0.82 and 0.89) with better sensitivity (85.0-95.0%) and acceptable specificity (75.0-83.3%) for differentiating IPASs from PNETs.
CONCLUSIONS
Texture parameters have potential in differentiating IPASs from PNETs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.