American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2022
Standard orthodontic treatment after condylectomy for patients with active unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Yingjie, Zheng Yalei, Cai Hengxing, Meng Qinggong, Fang Wei, Ke Jin, Long Xing, Chen Guoxin
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) is a progressive, nonneoplastic overgrowth of the condyle of the temporomandibular joint. For treating active UCH, a popular method combines orthognathic surgery with high condylectomy and orthodontic treatment. The goal of this study was to introduce a new method to correct asymmetry for active UCH.
METHODS: Retrospectively, 47 patients with active UCH were divided into horizontal-type, vertical-type, and combined-type. All patients were treated with condylectomy plus postsurgery standard orthodontics (CPSO) with applied miniscrews implanted in infrazygomatic crest and hard palate to intrude affected side of maxillary molars and apply intermaxillary traction for contralateral molars. Cone-beam computed tomography was taken at presurgery, postsurgery, and the end of orthodontics (T3).
RESULTS: In the vertical (n = 10) and combined (n = 28) types, deviation of the chin and the canting of the mandible and maxillary occlusal plane were significantly reduced at T3. A difference in the torque of bilateral maxillary first molar (U6) and bilateral mandibular first molar (L6) was significantly reduced at T3. The anterior, superior, and posterior joint spaces in the vertical-type and combined-type were significantly decreased at T3 compared with postsurgery. In contrast, in the horizontal-type group (n = 9), the deviation of the chin was corrected; however, the canting of the mandible and maxillary occlusal plane was significantly increased at T3 compared with presurgery.
CONCLUSIONS: CPSO restored facial and occlusal symmetry for vertical-type and combined-type active UCH and returned affected-side condyle to the glenoid fossa. However, CPSO was not suitable for treating the horizontal-type UCH.
METHODS: Retrospectively, 47 patients with active UCH were divided into horizontal-type, vertical-type, and combined-type. All patients were treated with condylectomy plus postsurgery standard orthodontics (CPSO) with applied miniscrews implanted in infrazygomatic crest and hard palate to intrude affected side of maxillary molars and apply intermaxillary traction for contralateral molars. Cone-beam computed tomography was taken at presurgery, postsurgery, and the end of orthodontics (T3).
RESULTS: In the vertical (n = 10) and combined (n = 28) types, deviation of the chin and the canting of the mandible and maxillary occlusal plane were significantly reduced at T3. A difference in the torque of bilateral maxillary first molar (U6) and bilateral mandibular first molar (L6) was significantly reduced at T3. The anterior, superior, and posterior joint spaces in the vertical-type and combined-type were significantly decreased at T3 compared with postsurgery. In contrast, in the horizontal-type group (n = 9), the deviation of the chin was corrected; however, the canting of the mandible and maxillary occlusal plane was significantly increased at T3 compared with presurgery.
CONCLUSIONS: CPSO restored facial and occlusal symmetry for vertical-type and combined-type active UCH and returned affected-side condyle to the glenoid fossa. However, CPSO was not suitable for treating the horizontal-type UCH.